• rss icon
  • itunes logo

Cycling: It’s Not About Us & Them

An article on the road.cc website yesterday hightlights what wrong with “us” just as much as what’s wrong with “them”.

Firstly, I really like Road.cc.  It’s a great website, usually full of well-written articles.  But the piece published on the 19th of February titled ‘Naughty cyclists’ doc presented by former Top Gear man, had me reaching for that most pithy of bart Simpson quotes; “this both sucks AND blows”.

The piece looks ahead to a regional BBC programme containing a report by former Top Gear presenter, Adrian Simpson, asking; “With one in five cyclists riding roughshod over the law, has pedal power gone too far?”.  It freely admits that “details of the programme are sketchy at the moment” and that they’re “not really sure which set of cycling-related crime statistics Mr Simpson is referring to”.  Road.cc goes on to assert that the programme will “present a fair and accurate picture of cycling in London of the sort you’d expect from a former presenter of Top Gear.”

However, it’s not the contention in Tom Henry’s post that the BBC programme will be as biased as its’ title suggests.  That’s the problem television has always had with presenting what are, essentially, “Op-Ed”  pieces – the lines between what is news and what is opinion are often dangerously blurred. No, it’s that in the proceeding paragraphs he goes on to consign Adrian Simpson, along with other former Top Gear presenters Vicki Butler-Henderson and Tiff Needell, to the ‘where-are-they-now’ file – victims of the BBC revamp that saw Jeremy Clarkson return to “ride roughshod over anything that doesn’t belong in his world”.

All, arguably, true.  But if the BBC wants to get swept along with the Daily Mail and every other internet troll trying to start a tide of “US versus…”, we shouldn’t be so keen to retract into being the “THEM” that such protagonists so cravenly seek.  It’s both pointless and stupid, leads to nothing more than retreating to intractable positions and willfully ignores where we all go wrong.  Do people do stupid, dangerous things in cars on a daily basis?  Of course they do.  Do people do equally stupid, dangerous things whilst on a bike on any given day too?  You bet your lycra clad ass they do!

And before you start snorting with the kind of righteous indignation normally reserved for nerds pointing out a plot inconsistencies at Star Trek convention, yes, I know all the arguments about cars and how much damage they can do.  I’m not here to defend the automobile.  But by the same token I have no wish or desire to blindly defend cyclists with facile, deprecatory remarks on the careers of TV Presenters.  Nor should Road.cc or Tom Henry.  Nor should you.

Here’s a notion: how about, instead of petty mud-slinging, we wait until after the programme has aired and then judge it on it’s merits?  Here’s a link in case you want to watch it on or after the 22nd of Feb.

  • owen_p
    "Ban the Bunch" post on cyclingtips: http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2010/02/ban-the-bunch/

    This was the article that chimed with me after the reliability rides, which are big bunch training rides that can turn into a bit of a race, but without marshalls, safety car or anything like that.
  • owen_p
    Witness (and party) to one or two stupid things on a bike today. Was in a bunch of maybe 50 or 60, shifting pretty fast, I moved over the white line to move up the group a bit. Cars were coming.

    Some guys pulled some daft manouvers in a queue of traffic in Callender but the bunch had slowed down to a sensible pace through the town so that was good.

    Then there was a slight bit of chaos on the massive keir roundabout between Dunblane and Bridge of Allan. I got stuck on the inside of the roundabout wanting to exit left, when a huge HGV pulled out in front of me. Had to sprint past it and cut in left across the front of it to make my turning- think that was the right thing to do but

    Big, fast group rides are the worst sort of environment for 'best practice'. There was some stuff on Cyclingtips about this I think. In most other scenarios I try to follow the rules of the road to the letter.
  • Wholehearted agreement here. The whole us and them argument is even more facile when we remember that most of us belong on both sides as cyclists and car drivers. It's interesting to note that nobody has ever tried to find out whether the cyclists who are most disrespecting of the law on two wheels are also inclined to flaunt the rules of the road as badly on four. In my case I'm a law abiding cyclist who breaks the letter of the law EVERY time I drive - don't most of us "push it" to 32 or 33mph rather than 28 or 29? The only point to these random thoughts is to show that there is no black and no white in this debate, just infinite shades of grey, which makes drawing battle lines confusing and pointless. That's why I decided not to buy an I Pay Road Tax jersey in the end - to me it it feels like the time to arbitrate not aggravate.
blog comments powered by Disqus